Operational Readiness for AI Driven Learning: Examining the Inter-play of Self-Assessed Competence, Usage Patterns and Trust

Authors

  • Leonore Negt Helmut-Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Germany Author
  • Marie Rathmann Helmut-Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Germany Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33687/ijef.003.04.00169

Keywords:

Operational readiness, generative AI in education, trust in AI, self-assessed AI competence, Open Educational Resources (OER)

Abstract

Since the release of generative AI systems in autumn 2022, AI use in academic contexts has gained relevance worldwide. Developing AI-related competencies has emerged as an educational task within the field of learning technologies aimed at enhancing learning outcomes. Against this background, the DigiTaKS*-project investigates how usage patterns, trust in AI, and self-assessed AI compe-tencies are interrelated and how these factors influence students’ operational readiness to integrate AI-driven applications into their learning processes. We frame this presented approach as an idea that can be adapted to different regions and educational systems. This contribution presents findings from a questionnaire study conducted among bachelor’s students in Humanities and Social Sciences at a German university (N = 70). Results indicate that usage, trust, and self-assessed AI competence are closely intertwined and significantly predict opera-tional readiness to integrate AI into academic learning processes. These findings highlight the need for structured educational approaches that systematically foster these interrelated dimensions. In response, the Open Educational Resource (OER) “ComDigiS*” was developed within the project DigiTaKS* to systematically promote reflective, competence-oriented, and equitable AI integration in academic contexts. It conceptualizes AI as a form of machine intelligence and supports in-teracting with AI across different cognitive levels from understanding and apply-ing to critically reflecting thereby fostering a holistic set of AI-use competencies for students. However, the paper presents student AI practices based on ques-tionnaire results and the Open Educational Resource ComDigiS* for promoting (AI) competence development.  Grounded in a European setting, the study pro-poses an approach intended for context-sensitive adaptation across diverse edu-cational systems. While the study is grounded in a European higher-education context, it explicitly acknowledges the situatedness of its concepts. This opens a perspective on how the proposed heuristic can be adapted to diverse educational settings across regions, such as educational contexts across the African conti-nent.

References

African Union. (2024). Continental artificial intelligence strategy: Harnessing AI for Africa’s development and prosperity. African Voice AI. https://www.africanvoiceai.org/post/au-continental-artificial-intelligence-strategy

An, Q., Koh, J. H. L., & Liu, Q. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of student use and learning outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10561

Carter, L., Liu, D., & Cantrell, C. (2020). Exploring the intersection of the digital divide and artificial intelligence: A hermeneutic literature review. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00138

Deja, M., & Kisilowska-Szurmińska, M. (2026). Multi-criteria decision model for AI readiness in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261430944

Digel, S., & Biel, C. (2025). Empowering learners to deal with artificial intelligence. In F. Bellinger, R. Bolten-Bühler, & M. Rohs (Eds.), Adult education research on digitalisation: Concepts, scopes, understandings (pp. 23–44). wbv Media. https://doi.org/10.3278/9783763978557

Diren, D. D., & Horzum, M. B. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based adaptive learning model for distance learning readiness. In D. Ifenthaler & S. Seufert (Eds.), Artificial intelligence education in the context of work (pp. 139–154). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14489-9_8

Esposito, M., Tse, T., Goh, D., & Arun, R. (2026). AI Compass: Measuring organizational readiness in the transition to AI-native systems. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6692679

Eurostat. (2024). Digitalisation in Europe – 2024 edition. European Commission.

Eurostat. (2026). Use of artificial intelligence by individuals. Statistics Explained. European Commission.

Holmström, J. (2022). From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework. Business Horizons, 65(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.03.006

International Telecommunication Union. (2025a). Measuring digital development: State of digital development and trends in the Africa region: Challenges and opportunities. ITU.

International Telecommunication Union. (2025b). Measuring digital development: State of digital development and trends in the Europe region: Challenges and opportunities. ITU.

Kersting, N. (2020). Digitale Ungleichheiten und digitale Spaltung. In T. Klenk, F. Nullmeier, & G. Wewer (Eds.), Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung (pp. 1–11). Springer VS.

Rosemann, T., Rathmann, M., Schiller, J., & Schmidt-Lauff, S. (2026). Trust in artificial intelligence: Challenges of educational equity and ethics in students’ practices in German higher education. In E. Jean-Francois & M. van Wyk (Eds.), Artificial intelligence for educational inclusion and equity: International studies and critiques. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035346431.00017

Schmidt-Lauff, S. (Ed.). (2025). Transformative digitale Kompetenzen: Entwicklungen für Hochschule, Studium und Gesellschaft (1st ed.). wbv. https://doi.org/10.3278/9783763978625

Stützer, C. M., Gaaw, S., Herbst, S., & Pengel, N. (2023). Ménage à trois. Zur Beziehung von künstlicher Intelligenz, Hochschulbildung und Digitalität. In T. Schmohl, A. Watanabe, & K. Schelling (Eds.), Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung: Chancen und Grenzen des KI-gestützten Lernens und Lehrens (Vol. 4, pp. 51–70). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457696

van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

von Garrel, J., Mayer, J., & Mühlfeld, M. (2023). Künstliche Intelligenz im Studium: Eine quantitative Befragung von Studierenden zur Nutzung von ChatGPT & Co. https://doi.org/10.48444/HDOCS-PUB-395

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Wang, C., Boerman, S. C., Kroon, A. C., Möller, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2024). The artificial intelligence divide: Who is the most vulnerable? New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241232345

Weitzel, H., & Wilhelm, J. (2025). AI & generative AI in adult education. In F. Bellinger, R. Bolten-Bühler, & M. Rohs (Eds.), Adult education research on digitalisation: Concepts, scopes, understandings (pp. 189–208). wbv Media. https://doi.org/10.3278/9783763978557.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-21

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Operational Readiness for AI Driven Learning: Examining the Inter-play of Self-Assessed Competence, Usage Patterns and Trust (L. . Negt & M. Rathmann , Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Education Foundations, 3(4), 854-862. https://doi.org/10.33687/ijef.003.04.00169

Similar Articles

11-20 of 143

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.